Thursday 27 December 2012

Risky business


Sorry for the delayed post, but I hope everyone has had a good Christmas! Being the time of year that it is, I was reminded of the destructive tsunami that took place back on Boxing Day in 2004. I thought I’d therefore have a look at the impacts of sea level rise in south east Asia, particularly Indonesia.

The last IPCC report projected sea level rise to affect low-lying lands in the region, “increasing the annual number of people flooded in coastal populations from 13 million to 94 million” by the end of the 21st century – 60% of this would occur in South Asia (from Pakistan to Burma), and 20% in South East Asia (from Thailand through to Vietnam) (IPCC, 2007). The report summarised that all Asian coastal areas (especially low lying ones) will be increasingly under threat by sea level rise in the coming future, with the additional risks of tropical storms and surges. The effects will be especially devastating in this area due to its generally high population density, and abundant economic/agricultural activity. For example, 98.4% of Indonesian population live within 100km of a coastline (Forster, 2010).

The impacts of potential inundation due to rising seas will negatively affect these coastlines, as much of their economy relies on the activities that take place here, such as farming. Another issue is the risk of freshwater resources being contaminated with salt water. This article focuses on the Semarang area of Indonesia. The locals are very aware of the problems of inundation, and have taken appropriate precautionary steps such as dike construction, a pumping system, and reconstructing houses with raised floors (see below):



However, for additional infrastructure, they also require finance. In this article, GIS is used to model scenarios of 120cm, and 180cm inundation and the sectors affected them most:



It seems the fishpond area – i.e. fish production – would be affected the most due to changing ecosystem of the water. However of course all the other sectors will be affected to some considerable degree also.

Another article, looking at the Sayung coastal area, pointed to coastal erosion being one of the main issues faced, displacing settlements as a result. Their approaches to tackle this include mangrove planting, elevation of the ground level, using wells for freshwater access, and perhaps focusing more on the tourism sector rather than for example fishpond farming (as this seems to be heavily affected).  

From these studies, it is clear that sea level rise is a very serious threat not just to Indonesia, but I think all the coastal countries in this region. It will not only cause environmental damage, but also lead to socio-economic losses. Therefore steps need to be taken to try hold the water back for as long as possible, although such infrastructure will require some financial aid. Essentially, land use management needs to improve, and the locals need to work together to tackle this.


References:

Forster, H. et al (2010) 'Sea-level rise in Indonesia: on adaptation priorities
in the agricultural sector', Regional Environmental Change, 11(4): 893-904 http://www.pik-potsdam.de/members/sterzel/foerster-et-al-2011


Marfai, M. et al (2008) 'Potential vulnerability implications of coastal inundation due to sea level rise for the coastal zone of Semarang city, Indonesia', Environmental Geology, 54(6): 1235-1245


Marfai, M. (2012) 'Preliminary assessment of coastal erosion and local community adaptation in Sayung coastal area, central java – Indonesia', Quaestiones Geographicae, 31(3): 47-55



Tuesday 18 December 2012

IPCC leak!


A draft of the next IPCC report has recently been leaked by an American blogger, Alec Rawls! It has however led to much debate and argument by climate skeptics about what to actually believe...

An article from New Scientist tells us more about some of the key details of this report.

I’m sure many including myself would agree with Rawls highlighting that humans will be the main driver of climate change. He then goes on to state that changing feedbacks within the climate system affect the impact of solar power on the climate, and that therefore this is essentially one of the key drivers of climate change. This has been questioned by other scientists however, saying that the sun doesn’t have much immediate effect over human timescales generally.

So what does the report have to say about sea level in particular? The IPCC believe that the Arctic may actually experience ice-free summers by the end of the century. This claim has of course been challenged by other scientists who claim this will happen even earlier (perhaps by 2050). The possibility is prevalent, however it looks like only time will tell. Ice sheet movement has also apparently been included in the models of sea level change.

I guess the question of the moment amongst climate scientists following this leak is the extent of solar effects on our climate vs fossil fuels? And that humans really are the main forcing factor of climate change now. For instance, this blog ridicules the IPCC by saying that their report doesn’t even make logical sense.
Uh oh! Who are we to believe now? The climate world is full of such contradictions, it’s hard to predict what the actual truth is. This was however just a draft report, that has seemed to have caused a stir in the climate world. Over the next few months we will have to wait and see what is actually to come...

A few sites to check:

Tuesday 4 December 2012

Polar Express


A recent article from the BBC has outlined the findings of a number of polar research teams, in terms of the effect of ice from Greenland and Antarctica on sea level rise. The mechanisms of these ice sheets are pretty difficult to track and measure accurately. What this combined study has found is that the contribution of melting Polar ice has been one fifth of the overall rise in sea level since 1992.

Additionally, the East Antarctic ice sheet has actually gained mass due to more snowfall, whereas the West Antarctic, Antarctic Peninsula, and Greenland ice sheets, have all lost mass. As Professor Shepherd summed up perfectly, "We would expect Greenland to melt more rapidly because the temperatures have risen…West Antarctica to flow more quickly because the ocean is warmer. And we would also expect East Antarctica to grow because there's more snowfall as a consequence of climate warming."

They concluded by saying how the ice sheets have contributed 11.1mm on average to sea level rise as a whole. The study has proved to us just how much these ice sheets have actually contributed to sea level rise thus far, and has given us one final, overall estimate for this.
The graph below (taken from the BBC article) shows the combined effects:




It’s good that they finally have collaborated all the uncertainties in terms of estimates, to give us a clearer picture of what’s really been going on. The future is still uncertain, however these new figures definitely seem to have helped, and hopefully scientists will be able to work onwards from this and find out more in the coming years about what lies ahead...

Check out the article for a short video clip, and more information: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-20543483