The Big Apple. Recently hit by “frankenstorm” Hurricane Sandy. Something
this article
mentioned caught my attention. The storm resulted in sea levels reaching 14
feet higher than the average low-tide mark (9 feet higher than the high tide
average). But the danger isn’t the actual surge, but the return to normal – the
high water mark has changed. The frequency of such storms is likely to increase
due to warming of waters – sea level rise means that these surges will have
even more of an impact in the future (Childs, 2012). It has now been suggested
that New York should invest in the building of storm surge barriers, to prevent
such destruction in the future.
The video from this site has emerged following Sandy, where we find out the opinions from some New Yorkers themselves. (sorry I could not get it to embed within this post, but it's definitely worth watching!)
The question, is safety vs. beauty... would they rather be safe from future threats, or prefer a better view from their windows?
If it were up to me, I would definitely advise them to take action as soon as possible. The threats are imminent and seem to only be getting worse. It is expensive to build the infrastructure, however it will be a worthy investment, and save, at least to some extent, the future of New York.
References:
Childs, C. (2012) Our Latest High-Water Mark, The New York Times (WWW) http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/03/opinion/our-latest-high-water-mark.html
Horton, R. et al (2010) Climate Observations and Projections, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1196:
41-62
PBS (2012) Protecting New York From Future Superstorms as Sea Levels Rise:
Rosenzweig, C. and W. Solecki (2012) Rising Sea Levels Are Serious, The
New York Times (WWW) http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/11/02/should-new-york-build-sea-gates/we-must-take-rising-sea-levels-seriously?smid=tw-roomfordebate&seid=auto
No comments:
Post a Comment